Welcome to Kreitlow Corner

Do You Have World Health Insurance?

2011-12-29T08:16:00.001-08:00

When best bodies get an allowance policy, they accomplish a lot of assumptions about their coverage. One accepted acceptance is that they are covered no amount area they are in the world. Typically, this is not true. Best behavior accept a bounded article in them. It is actual important that you apprehend your action thoroughly, and don't accomplish any assumptions about your coverage.

One acumen that best allowance companies don't accept apple bloom allowance is because bloom affliction systems alter from country to country. For your boilerplate bloom affliction provider, it is absurd to accord apple bloom insurance.

So what do you do if you biking frequently to do altered countries? If you are a common traveler, you accept a few altered options back it comes to all-around bloom insurance.

Your aboriginal advantage is to get acting allowance for the arena that you are traveling in. There are a lot of companies in The United States that will assure you about the world, but you accept to set it up afore you leave the country. Allowance ante and affairs are activity to be bent by the arena you are visiting.

Your abutting advantage is to acquisition a all-around bloom affliction package. These bales can be adamantine to acquisition and can be expensive, but they are basic for any traveler. One key affection of these bales is all-around assistance. If you are in a adopted country, it can be adamantine to acquaint with doctors, or to acquisition an adapted hospital. Best all-around bloom allowance bales accept a 1-800 cardinal that you can alarm so you can allocution to an abettor who can advice you. These bodies can advice construe for you and accord you admonition to the abutting hospital.

If you are a common traveler, you charge to accomplish abiding that you backpack a acceptable allowance plan for your trip.

World Health Insurance is a Protection

2011-12-29T08:15:00.001-08:00

Travel to adopted countries is accepted place. There are those who biking because they accept a good timeexperiencing added cultures and seeing the abounding wonders of the world. Others accept to biking for the account of business. Whatever the acumen may be it is all-important to accomplish abiding you accept apple bloom allowance afore you leave.

One of the affidavit you charge accept able medical allowance afore you leave is because there are countries that agree you charge be insured afore entering. If you admission at such destinations after bloom allowance it is actual acceptable you will be angry away. Those countries don't demand to backpack the amount of their visitors' bloom bills. If you are visiting a accepted arena again there are bags of visitors absorption there from about the apple and it is accessible to accept why such a adjustment exists.

It is not alone the added country that will be able from medical costs. You will additionally be able should you abatement ill or accept an abrupt accident. If you biking with a apple bloom allowance action you will accept allowance advantage no amount breadth you may go. You will additionally accept the account of actuality transported to addition country if there are no able medical facilities. This is decidedly important if you intend visiting developing countries or any added breadth that may be off the accepted day-tripper trail.

Traveling to adopted destinations can be big-ticket but don't try to save money on your medical insurance. It is far bigger to get the best apple bloom allowance that you can so that whatever may appear you will be financially covered. Most important of all you will get admission to the best medical care. Even if you can't allege the accent your medical allowance will do the talking so that you get what you deserve.

World Health Insurance is a Must If Travel is in Your Future

2011-12-29T08:14:00.001-08:00

With the way biking is today, it's accessible to pop assimilate an aeroplane and be about abroad in amount of hours. If you're a being who's generally in the air and abnormally overseas, you charge to accede apple bloom insurance. This can be a footfall aloft your accepted medical allowance plan or you can actualize a new one that allows you to accept affection bloom affliction wherever you go in the world.

No one knows back article bad could happen. Accidents, travel-related injuries, and illnesses can appear anywhere. They additionally can be from article simple like benumbed in a car or added circuitous like attempting to bathe beyond the English Channel. Either way, you will demand to accomplish abiding you get apple bloom allowance to ensure the blazon of bloom affliction you're acclimated to will abide back you're abroad from home. Because if you don't accept it, you could be actual accessible to huge abroad expenses.

Just like you can jump on a plane, you can additionally acquirement this blazon of advantage online. There are assorted websites that can accommodate you with altered quotes and prices to advice you accomplish the best decision. They will additionally action reviews from added consumers who accept been in agnate situations, as able-bodied as doctors' perspectives.

Pros:
* Worldwide advantage makes abiding you accept the blazon of bloom affliction you're acclimatized to.
* You will accept bloom allowance wherever you are in the world.

Cons:
* If you don't get it, you could be larboard with a huge bill.
* If you're in charge of insurance, article bad could accept happened.

World bloom allowance can advice you accomplish a astute accommodation in acceptance you analyze the world. Your bloom is actual important, so accomplish abiding you assure it to the best of your ability.

Globalization and the Need For World Health Insurance

2011-12-29T08:12:00.001-08:00

While the Apple Wide Web has afflicted the way we live, it's alone one indicator that globalization has become a allotment of our accustomed lives. Consider the actuality that you could buy a computer in the United States that's fabricated in Japan, get backup genitalia fabricated in Taiwan, and get chump abutment from a alarm centermost specialist in India! Addition indicator of globalization in today's apple is the rapidly accretion acceptance of apple bloom insurance.

While the Internet has appropriate us to biking beneath in assertive situations, globalization has fabricated all-embracing biking added admired than ever. Whether you charge to biking away for business or pleasure, you'll demand to break safe and advantageous wherever you go.

The botheration is that abounding adopted countries don't acquiesce traveling foreigners to accept acting admission to their healthcare systems. And if they do, it can booty always and a day to be reimbursed. That's why you charge apple bloom insurance. Avoid the bearings of actuality abandoned in the average of nowhere, with no agency of advantageous for your alteration to a medical facility. Or what if you eat some alien aliment and get aliment poisoning? Biking bloom action can help.

As back demography out any added bloom policy, back demography out a action for common bloom allowance it's acute to apperceive absolutely what advantage you'll need. As a accepted rule, it's bigger to accept added rather than less-to assure you in assorted situations that could arise.

Traveling away for leisure can decidedly put you at accident if you don't accept appropriate allowance for traveling. We usually aloof accompany abundant funds to awning our traveling expenses. So it's astute to defended biking bloom action to awning medical emergencies while abroad.

While globalization has additional the charge to biking abroad, apple bloom allowance helps to ensure that you'll break safe and complete back in addition country.

Why Get World Health Insurance?

2011-12-29T08:11:00.001-08:00

If you are a traveler, and you break in added countries alfresco your home country absolutely a bit, you absolutely charge to accept apple bloom insurance. You can get advantage for as continued as you charge it. If you charge it alone for 6 months, that is fine. If you charge it for 3 years because you will be belief abroad, that is accessible also. You can pay premiums monthly, quarterly, or annually.

Your basal advantage will be in-patient hospital stays, out-patient treatment, medical aborticide advantage for cases area there is not able affliction area you are located. You can additionally get dental insurance, activity allowance and maternology advantage as riders. Don't accept that these are automatically covered. They are usually not. Apple medical allowance will awning you anywhere in the apple you biking to. Be abiding to apprehend all the capacity of your action so that you are not afraid at a time that you can atomic handle a surprise. Apple bloom allowance advantage is a carriageable bloom plan that will chase you wherever you go.

The acumen to get apple bloom allowance is because of the adverse costs of bloom care. Bloom affliction is abnormally big-ticket if you charge to be hospitalized. In some countries the hospitals demand to be paid appropriate away, and demand you to aggregate from the allowance company. Most apple bloom allowance companies will pay anon to the hospital or medical centermost though. You aloof accept to pay the antecedent deductible. If you don't backpack apple allowance and you charge medical affliction in addition country, you can acquaintance adverse banking problems. With the advantage you can biking with the accord of apperception that area anytime you are, you accept medical allowance coverage. You do not accept to anguish about loosing all your money due to an blow of affliction while you are abroad from your built-in country.

Is There Any Good Reason to Buy World Health Insurance?

2011-12-29T08:10:00.001-08:00

Indeed, there are tens of thousands. If you anticipate you'll be covered if you become ailing or afflicted in added countries, you adeptness demand to anticipate again. Before you abolish the abstraction of affairs apple bloom insurance, it's account your time to bright up some misconceptions. Let's see how your behavior about these accepted misconceptions admeasurement up. Who knows? You adeptness aloof change your mind:

Misconception #1: I can allow to be aching or afflicted while away because bloom affliction costs are beneath big-ticket in added countries. Not alone are bloom affliction costs not consistently cheaper abroad, they are rarely cheaper for foreigners. Popular depictions of across countries with activity systems of accepted bloom affliction account abounding to accept that bargain affliction is accessible to everyone, but in best of these countries, alone taxpayers accept adopted rates. This agency that if you are ailing or injured, you may aloof pay abounding amount unless you accept purchased a apple bloom allowance policy.

Misconception #2: Added countries accept agnate standards as America back it comes to an obligation to amusement the sick. American standards specify that patients charge be advised in emergency apartment behindhand of their adeptness to pay. Yet in added countries (indeed, I accept accomplished emergency apartment in several altered ones), adopted patients are frequently asked to pay (or prove adeptness to pay) above-mentioned to actuality accustomed treatment.

Misconception #3: Back ailing or afflicted abroad, I will be chargeless to accomplish basal choices about my care, such as which hospital or provider. This is artlessly not true. Though, apple bloom allowance action holders accept added ascendancy over these. Some behavior alike accommodate options for aborticide to a country with bigger hospitals or one's country of origin.

For added advice on apple bloom insurance, acquisition a acceptable amount adduce account online.

Safe World Health Insurance Quotes

2011-12-29T08:09:00.001-08:00

Any common adventurer will apparently be able to account by demography out a apple bloom allowance policy. Most medical allowance behavior will alone awning you in your home country, which agency if you're a US aborigine again you will alone be covered in the acceptable old US of A. If you frequently biking to adopted acreage again demography out common medical allowance will be vital.

You will never apperceive back you will be afflicted by bloom complaints and problems which can be cher to correct. If you are in a adopted country and accept an blow again it can be acutely alarming not alive what to do. Your costs actuality ability be abundant added than in your home country, not alone because of college medical costs but additionally possibly because you charge an analyst to allocution to doctors and nurses.

When arcade about for apple bloom allowance quotes it is basic that you acquisition one which additionally offers assistance. This abetment amalgamation will advice you to acquisition a accurate hospital which is safe to go to, and additionally accomplish it abundant easier to allocution to doctors and nurses.

Before you can booty out any all-around medical allowance affairs you charge assignment out how continued you will break for. If you're alone blockage for a abbreviate aeon of time again a acting plan will suffice. If about you are casual and active away again you will charge to attending into abiding apple bloom allowance policies. You aloof charge to accomplish abiding that the medical allowance behavior will accommodate awning to the countries that you are traveling to. Certain areas of the apple will be added big-ticket than others depending on the costs of medical analysis and accompanying costs in the countries.

Even back you're away you charge accept bloom allowance to booty acceptable affliction of your health.

Who Needs World Health Insurance?

2011-12-29T08:08:00.000-08:00

If you are a common adventurer alfresco of your home country, but you accept absolute bloom advantage at home, you may not charge apple bloom insurance. You may alone charge to get travelers allowance that will awning you in the countries you plan to visit. If you biking added than most, and on a approved basis, you may demand to accede apple bloom insurance. This is allowance that will awning your medical costs anywhere you travel, alike aural your home country.

Health allowance that covers you no amount area you biking will acceptable be a bit added big-ticket than if you aloof acquirement travelers insurance, because it is alive abounding time. It will awning you anywhere aural the world. You can get basal above medical affairs that awning you anywhere. You may demand to add added advantage as well. Maybe you will accede dental advantage as a addition to your plan. You will acceptable additionally accept adventitious afterlife and dismemberment. You can additionally accept riders that will awning emergency aborticide insurance, so that you can be transported to a abode that has the all-important medical accessories to amusement you.

Many of these affairs can be continued to awning your ancestors associates if they biking with you. You can do allegory arcade for apple bloom allowance online to attenuated bottomward the cardinal of companies that you are considering. You should, afterwards you accept narrowed bottomward the choices, get in blow with an abettor that specializes in these types of policies. You demand to accomplish abiding that addition answers all your questions and helps you accomplish the best accommodation for your needs. You demand to accomplish abiding that you can focus on your business needs or added issues while you travel, rather than annoying about whether you accept able bloom allowance coverage.

The global marketing environment

2011-11-15T23:27:00.000-08:00

Global marketing environment is a difficult term to explain, as it covers all aspects of the world are continually changing. To explain the real situation of the environment is necessary to go through the most current literature and study the current changes. This chapter is giving the idea of marketing the current challenges and changes and the forces of the underwater environment.

Today is marketing

The change in customer behavior and the proliferation of new marketing channels configurations of the new issues in the business world. Competition in the international market is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain lifelong relationship with customers. Selling quality products and service at an affordable price, it is not enough to win the loyalty of customers there are many other dimensions of care. These changes modify the secondary gains and customer-centric organizations and organizations born of new theories and approaches.

Marketing today has come out with the circle of 4P (product, price, place and promotion) and in the broadest sense it is taking as a function of the organization. The modified form of marketing is to deliver greater value to customers and develop and maintain a healthy relationship.

According to the American Marketing Association Marketing today is:

"Marketing is an organizational function and a set of processes for creating, communicating and delivering value to customers and for managing customer relationships in ways that benefit the organization and its stakeholders." (Keefe, 2004)

Macro Environment and

The global marketing environment includes the environment and the macroeconomic environment. The intermediate environment contains factors that are semi-controllable through contracts and will be categorized as suppliers, distributors, promoters and shareholders. For example, in the industries of software from different vendors, application vendors, temporary specialized subcontractors, etc. are part of the environment in between. The macro environment consists of the factors and forces that are often uncontrollable. (Lee, 2005)

For global marketing strategic planning to assess and investigate threats, opportunities and risk assessment generally used by organizations maja maja analysis here is synonymous with political and economic factors, social, technological, legal and environmental. (The macro environmental forces are also shown in the figure above). External auditor are mostly used to audit the impact of these forces.

Some countries have policies that are more relaxed and easy to import and export.

The history of the countries of the friendship and healthy business offerings also have a positive impact on future trade. Similarly, if countries have better infrastructure for trade policies and legislation that also goes for international traders. This helps minimize the time and provide safe treatment and especially the newcomers feel comfortable with the trade in that environment. With all these reasons the fresh literature speaks of the participation of twelve factors in international trade.

In 2005, according to Geri Clarke FREDICT aid is a more comprehensive framework for analyzing international marketing environment.

H F Financial History

Economic R-E International Trade Rules

LE Language Environment

PD population policy

S Social Infrastructure I

C Culture

T Technology

Changes and Challenges

In 1998, article in The Economist sums it up nicely:

"Marketing has become a complex art. Technology and trade have increased the potential for global brands. The fragmentation of audiences and rising costs of television and print advertising are doing other media appeal. And the direct marketing and the Internet are rewriting the rules of marketing. "

55 years ago, the invention of television opens up new forms of mass marketing and visual demonstration of the many local brands and now have the status of world-class brand. This technology changes the language of advertising. In old age, especially people preferred to buy the things of the search market and mainly transmitted by radio market issues and new products coming. Then television gave new confidence to their viewers worldwide and announces the real market position. The visual demonstration also teach and guide people properly and also responded to the question why they need and want this specific product. Now the World Wide Web is taking the position of the TV and digital TV mode and Smart phones are writing new rules of marketing.

Today phones and pagers is the basic necessity of people and everyone is in the range only by a small piece of technology. Here telecommunications was playing an important role. Now, in the late 20th century, the emergence of Internet and telecommunications to introduce m-commerce. First phone companies simply provide update information as weather reports, online gaming, the latest movies and songs, and more information only to provide better service and customer satisfaction. From that time the m-commerce became part of our life and no one feels this addition of new business technology, today banks and other financial services are also providing mobile commerce services and this small device has become the source of market transactions. This was the short review of the development of technology.

On the other hand the destructive incidents such as 9 / 11 and 7 / 7, etc. and other country's wars (war on terrorism) are destroying the developed markets and investors are afraid to invest money in these risk areas.

The customer buying behavior and their perception of quality is changing and is now demanding that the rich value-added products and services. Multinational corporations and chain stores also create a strong global competition and increasingly difficult to maintain a long term relationship with existing customers.

However, the last decade of the twentieth century, bought great changes redefine the role and concept of marketing. The rapidly changing customer market made more sophisticated and value added requirements. Products / services development and management has changed dramatically, the values of third and made Internet transactions easier and virtual payment and distribution channels to introduce new form of market approach (O'Connor, 2001).

The global marketing environment

The global financial crisis and its impact

2011-11-15T23:18:00.000-08:00

The financial crisis of 2008-2009 is a major financial crisis. It became prominently visible in September 2008 with the bankruptcy, merger, or conservatorship of several large United States-based financial firms. The main causes of the crisis had been published in business journals for many months before September, with commentary on the financial stability of major U.S. investment banks and Europe, insurance companies and mortgage banks following the subprime mortgage crisis.

From the failures of large financial institutions in the United States, quickly became a global credit crisis, deflation and a sharp reduction in shipping resulting in a number of European bank failures and declining rates diverse actions, and a reduction in market value of equities (stocks) and commodities worldwide.

The credit crisis was exacerbated by Section 128 of the Law on Emergency Economic Stabilization 2008, which allowed the Federal Reserve System to pay interest on excess reserve balances held on deposit from banks, removing the long-term incentive for banks to extend credit instead of cash on deposit with the Treasury's central bank. The crisis led to a problem of liquidity and deleveraging of financial institutions, especially in the United States and Europe, which further accelerated the liquidity crisis and a decline in international shipping and trade. Political leaders and national ministers of finance and central bank directors have coordinated their efforts to reduce fears but the crisis continues and continues to change, evolving at the end of January in a currency crisis with investors transferring large capital resources stronger currencies like the yen, dollar and Swiss franc, leading many emerging economies to seek help from the International Monetary Fund. The crisis was triggered by the crisis of subprime mortgages and is an acute phase of the financial crisis of 2007-2008.

Russia's economy affected

The Russian financial crisis of 2008-2009, part of the global economic crisis of 2008, is a crisis in financial markets of Russia, who came from the crisis in U.S. sub-prime mortgages and has been compounded by political fears after the war with Georgia, and the falling oil price of Urals heavy crude, which has lost more than 70% of its value since its record high of $ 147 on 4 in July 2008. While according to the World Bank, Russia's strong short-term macroeconomic fundamentals make it better prepared than many emerging economies to tackle the crisis, structural weaknesses and high dependence on a single product price that its impact more pronounced than would be the case. Fiscal agile and heavy financial reserves have protected Russia could more deeply the consequences of this clash.

Reasons why gold will rise in 2009

Treasury Secretary Paulson spoke about the current crisis is potentially worse than the Great Depression. Alan Greenspan told Congress that the financial crisis had left him in a "state of shocked disbelief." The leading economists are saying "this looks an awful lot like the beginning of the second Great Depression."

U.S. consumer confidence has fallen more sharply than at any other time since records began in 1978. From 09 September, we saw the nationalization of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG, the socialization of the automobile industry, the demise of investment banking, a ransom of $ 700 million with another recently passed stimulus plan, the Lehman Brothers; "breaking the buck" of the supposedly solid money market funds, the largest bank failure in history, the implosion of global stock markets, falling housing values, retail sales and consumer confidence, the biggest drop in industrial production in 34 years, and one unprecedented breach of trust, both in commodities and financial assets. It is increasingly apparent that fear predominates. Individual investors are abandoning anything with the slightest hint of risk. Last year was the worst year for global equity markets since the Great Depression, the Dow suffered its worst annual drop since 1931. Investors are taking large amounts of money from hedge funds, mutual funds and bond mutual funds in one of the biggest flights to safety in the financial industry has ever seen. Defensive asset class have assets that have the same risk / return characteristics are positively correlated with each other and are traditional inflation hedges that are negatively correlated with stocks - they do well when stocks do poorly. Historically, the main defensive assets has been the gold. Of the main assets, bonds and gold have only escaped the selling panic that gripped the markets. Gold rose 5. 4% over 2008, ending the year above $ 850 a troy ounce. Gold bullion reached $ 1030.80 in mid-March and mints around the world ran out of popular gold coins and small bars of gold after the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September. The U.S. rate cutreduced to virtually zero opportunity cost of buying gold and gold ETF holdings have soared from 7 million ounces to more than 30 million ounces in less than four years of gold is different from other precious metals such as platinum, palladium and silver because the demand for these precious metals arises mainly from its industrial applications.

Increase in value of gold is derived from its use and worldwide acceptance as a store of value and a safe haven. Other precious metals also have been classified as defensive assets, but have not worked as well as gold during the crisis. For example, investment accounts for about 90% of gold demand, while investment represents only one third of the total demand for platinum. Therefore, although gold has done well, demand for platinum is for industrial use has declined rapidly, particularly due to the high concentration of platinum use in new cars - an endangered species in an economy that the automakers are asking Washington for funds to keep afloat. The price of gold has been supported by the view that it is a safe haven in times of economic or political uncertainty, while industrial demand for platinum has plummeted. Platinum reached a record high of $ 2267.00 per ounce in March, but fell like a stone from there, like silver. Platinum fell nearly 60% since its peak in March, while silver fell 47%. The last time gold traded for more than platinum was January 21, 1994, when gold closed at $ 381.70 and $ 380.90 platinum.

The global financial crisis and its impact

The disintegration of the global economy

2011-11-15T23:07:00.000-08:00

The Greek debt crisis has pushed the EU into a panic. Greece and may be a lost cause. Portugal and Ireland are close behind Greece in default on its debt, and Belgium, Italy and Spain could be next. While the austerity measures are put in these European debt ridden countries, the people are protesting to maintain public services that give them a decent lifestyle. And this fear has come to the U.S.. Republicans are pushing to balance the economy, no matter who gets hurt because of the loss programs. It seems as if the Great Recession has changed the playing field for a global economy, and there seems no way out. We all want to go back to what we had before, but this may happen even more?

The study of astrological ages, 35 years ago, it became clear that the world had changed. The new idea at the time was the creation of a global economy, an idea that reflects the astrological energy of Aquarius. Aquarius governs the global communications and global culture. So how is Aquarius affect us today? We are currently in the Age of Pisces. Pisces rules dissolution, among other things. Each period contains twelve eras. The 1800's 1980 were the Age of Aquarius at this age. During that time the world expanded or reduced, and became connected world in the second half of the twentieth century. This era gave us the Industrial Revolution and the Twentieth Century. The idea of a global economy in an interconnected world became a major focus for humanity. This idea is also reflected in the closeness we feel with the coming Age of Aquarius in 2160. All this is fine, except that the time is not linear. We leave behind the Age of Aquarius in 1980, and are not yet in the Age of Aquarius. The time for a real global economy is still in the future.

Each period contains twelve stages and that the world has been in a state of dissolution since 1965, the phase of the Age of Pisces, Aquarius, 1965 and 1980. Unemployment and welfare began a sharp rise in late 1960. Inflation became a serious economic problem, and cities were quickly driven to the brink of bankruptcy. Since 1980 we have been in the Age of Pisces to the Age of Pisces. This has been a double bath to dissolve the energies that have caused many serious problems for society as increasing pressure on the economies of all countries.

Pisces energy dissolution and disintegration polarity of Virgo and extinction have led to industrial toxic pollution and nuclear weapons, global warming and climate change, increased volcanic activity and earthquakes, floods and storms of huge fire , and a massive increase in the extinction of species. Terrorism, depression and suicides have increased dramatically. Things are falling apart now in Pisces / Virgo fashion. The additional costs of these trends have been enormous, and have been badly hurt economies worldwide.

While the rules Aquarius world brotherhood and culture, and global communications, this was a Pisces, with Virgo polarity rules are divided into smaller parts and the dissolution of global interconnect lines that are necessary for a global culture. Virgo were some moments of isolated feudal closed to the surrounding communities. Ages of Pisces has been moments of social and political crisis and confusion. Due to the polarity, the two powers go hand in hand. Pisces is a water sign, Pisces and the dissolution of cohesion affects a group's emotional and mental ability to think rationally. The earth sign Virgo disintegration and extinction increases the tendency to separate from the others in a state of isolation. Pisces fear intensifies the need for isolation.

What this means is that the idea of a global economy does not correspond to the energies of this time period we are in. The seed was set at the end of the Age of Aquarius, but it will not take shape until we enter the age of Aquarius in another 150 years. And the story and is pushing us to consider this possibility. The phase of the Age of Taurus, Pisces, 1995 to 2010, was a period of increasing greed and dissolution of the economy. Taurus rules money and the economy. The economist Paul Krugman warned that time he had entered a period he calls a return to depression economics, where human fears and greed override the rules of the economy. The devastating economic debacle Asian flu took the world by storm in 1997. The Great Recession destroyed the idea that real estate is a sound investment, has led to the current debt crisis in the EU, and economic need to pay our debts in the U.S.. As we approach the Gemini phase, from 2010 to 2025, the quality of the division will be at the forefront of almost everything we do. The global economy is likely to break, to some extent, and the political and economic thought are polarized. We see that the polarization in politics already.

We should note that the times are telling us to pull back and take care of our countries and local communities at this time. Our global economy is based on the control of emerging global economies, and the immense suffering they inflict on businesses local populations. Perhaps the times are telling us to pull back and create small sustainable communities, which act as a solid foundation for the creation of a global economy in the Age of Aquarius arrives.

The disintegration of the global economy

The global crisis - Promotion of Local Development and Employment

2011-11-15T22:50:00.000-08:00

I'm no economist, but I understand the reality of the challenges facing Africa today, due to the negative impact of the global economic crisis and will give an overview on the topic of global crisis, an African perspective. There is no doubt that Africa has been hardest hit by the impact of the global financial crisis and this summit is brainstorming to find solutions to the unfortunate plight. If you are looking for solutions, let me share my experiences with you.

Globalization for each stretch of the imagination has great advantages. Unfortunately, it is clear that Africa has not benefited from its positive aspects and instead said has become far more dependent on developed countries to the great detriment of the suffering masses. Africa has been vulnerable to a number of reasons. The first is the lack of national tenacity, accountability and a spirit of patriotic fervor. Africa has been unable to stay united and strong, because a good number of us in leadership positions, rather than uphold the ideals that protect the sovereignty of our countries have fallen to the dictates of our colonial and development partners and recently through its multinational organizations that come with promises of employment, capital and infrastructure development.

Unfortunately these investment opportunities do not benefit from the mass of our people because of political and economic parasites who are in charge of the affairs of our countries. Corruption is real and if not the key factor for the failure of Africa in our deliberations on these next few days and saddle ourselves only with a scientific approach to solve the effect of global crisis in Africa, we will be doing a disservice to the continent.

Corruption is a major drawback to any development process that spans our continent. Some of us have created a culture of impunity that allows us the right to use all sorts of methods to fleece our countries of their resources. If we can not improve on the corruption index each year on what basis do we mourn for the negative effect of the global economic crisis? The soul of some parts of the continent has literally been sold during the period of 30 to 50 years than most African countries have been supposedly independent from colonial rule. Ironic facets of our sovereignty seems to have returned to our colonial and development partners and some of their corporate entities.

Some of these foreign influences even dictate what the policy guidelines that we have to and unfortunately, have also adopted their cultures with patronizing arrogance. I appreciate the fact that they live in a vacuum and therefore can not be expected to produce everything they need locally, but we have to be so obsessed with foreign cultures and to their adoption as a sign of lifestyle of good quality. Globalization has its own dictates. He preaches the free movement of goods and services and denounces the imposition of any form of economic barriers. The assumption is that by doing so, all economies will benefit in the same place.

We know this has proven to be a nightmare, especially for those of us in Africa. And how can we expect a level playing field when there were clear differences from the start. Most of our continent lacks infrastructure development, it lacks the ability to transform natural resources into finished products and have never had bargaining power in trade. Although the production of cocoa, timber, minerals of all types and a considerable amount of oil that we sell ourselves short because sadly foreign interests to control the use of these natural resources on their own terms.

Are the changes brought about by globalization taking place in our terms? Have we been able to stem the tide of brain drain? Are we not accepting globalization to the detriment of our own development and survival? We know that most of us have inherent weaknesses in terms of our political relationship with our people. This is what makes us so vulnerable.

When globalization became a phrase China, for example, quickly tap on your primary resource - skilled labor - and proceeded to work hard at making everything imaginable in the world. Although he suffered a brain drain that said that most Chinese are formed in the West and other advanced economies back home to share this knowledge. Today China is a great economic and military power and respected worldwide. As part of the disadvantages and advantages of globalization seems to have suffered deprivation and the work of this summit to identify ways to stem this tide.

One of the main road of recovery is the institution of mechanisms to protect the national sovereignty of our countries in terms of economic development. Without clearly establish the mechanisms that describe the extent of investor transactions and the lack of structures to control their operations, many of these investors who abuse our national interests without control. Most of these investors to repatriate most of their earnings to their native countries, leaving us with little capital for reinvestment in other projects viable. The developing world needs political leadership, traditional judicial and bold and energetic company dedicated to improving the situation of his people.

Fourteen years ago, the Social Development Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, I challenged the Western banks and financial institutions to open their vaults and their books to expose leaders and personalities who had plundered the wealth of their countries, but were protected by the so-called Western banking standards of secrecy and confidentiality. At that time, my colleague from world leaders gathered there knew my problem with stunned silence. Fidel Castro was the only figure who welcomed the challenge.

The negative effect of globalization was a wakeup call. Governments and peoples around the world, after having felt the chilling effect of the siphon the wealth of their nations in foreign accounts and foreign wealth accumulation in drug trafficking, terrorist financing and the purchase of political power have gone after these banks to expose their criminal clients and their loot. If we can contain this type of savagery then economic decentralization and regionalization will be the way forward in our quest for development.

Decentralization is an energy transfer system that garners respect and confidence of the people we elect as leaders. Decentralization allows governments to share their problems with the common people. This is what has been structured and raised in what we call the local government. Everything must be done to encourage local governments. Share the central government's burden to people, what governance refers demystifies and brings people into contact with the problems facing the central government. Numerous examples are scattered throughout the continent of governments imposing the so-called development projects in their village when the towns priorities are totally different. During the mid-70, a government of Ghana spent hard earned resources to create a wall of the stadium when a modern medical center was required priority project for the people of the area.

The current global financial and economic crisis, which is the worst crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s, has confirmed what we in Africa have long known - that markets are fickle and are in favor of the strongest players . It is now more than ever clear that the international financial institutions that were mistaken for African States to adopt a hands-off approach and that this poor advice weakened African economies and put us in a bad position to withstand the current shocks. It is now clear that even the strongest economies, the effectiveness of timely government intervention has been demonstrated. We have seen that the state is not the enemy of development. In Africa, more than any other, no doubt, we need a strong state development can protect the rights of Africa to contribute to the global economy, not only as suppliers of raw materials or as hewers of wood.

But to do this, we must unite as Africans north and south of the Sahara and build a viable political and economic space and beautiful that can support creativity and ingenuity and initiative of our diverse and talented people. And do not be afraid to empower our people. When properly applied decentralization creates a healthy climate development, because the common people claim ownership of policies, projects and programs and are ready for the stomach along with the failures of government. How many governments are grappling with the face of public relations to convince people with all kinds of excuses for failed projects? If the decision to implement the projects are conducted in a top down approach, but in speaking with the people in a decentralized environment, there would be no need to spend scarce resources to protect the reputation of the government.

In Ghana, decentralization was achieved by establishing democratically elected district assemblies and their sub-structures. And through a system of elections and appointments in consultation with the chiefs and other opinion leaders 70 percent of the members was elected while 30 percent are reserved for appointees, who were mainly intellectuals and professionals looking for a good whose areas of expertise of the most informed decisions.

Decentralization and empowerment of people as leaders puts us in a position of responsibility, because the people instead of demanding accountability from them. Local government now has the potential to meet development that meets the basic needs and human rights of people in the developing world, helping to address the crisis of globalization. It has the potential to contribute to the prevention of conflicts related to the demands of good governance and participation.

Decentralization also encourages the practice of a greater sense of social responsibility to the sanitary conditions and preventing serious infectious and contagious diseases. It also allows a more responsible exploitation of local natural resources, while preventing environmental degradation. Local governments also have the potential to contribute to the management of the population and the reduction of extreme poverty and degradation. Decentralisation, if properly implemented provides the basis for regionalization. Regionalization as we all know we can exploit economies of scale, greater bargaining power and the exploitation of resources of the Member States for the benefit of the group.

Today the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is one of the most powerful regional groups in Africa. It took us centuries to get where we are today, but still not have the kind of economic integration necessary to ensure the benefits of economies of scale that allow us to have a common currency, build factories and touch each of the natural resources for development concluded.

But as stated earlier these steps require courageous leadership and a structure for effective decentralization, ensuring popular participation and ownership of national policies. This is crucial for successful integration of key players should be the people who participate in the process. Socio-cultural differences of our continent can only be achieved if the participants do not feel the ground that national sovereignty is being delivered by the central government.

As the world reflects on how you should modify this model of development called capitalism, we can consider that this is a good time to emphasize a return to African values and seriously question the emphasis on selfish individual, who is in the heart of the capitalist model that has led us to this sorry state of affairs worldwide. We need a return to community values and away from the values of the selfish. This is a time to insist that there is much that Africa can teach the world, if we believe in ourselves and the value of our cultural and spiritual heritage.

Africa has a steep hill to climb to soften the blow of the global financial crisis. However, if the continent is ready to take the bull by the horns and take courageous policies to lift Africa out of the darkness, then it will be a part of the battle.

Thank you.

The global crisis - Promotion of Local Development and Employment

The politics of global warming

2011-11-15T22:39:00.000-08:00

The politics of global warming have involved many different political debate, the design of policies, legislation and participation of global warming science and the response to global warming. The political war of words has involved many different government agencies, scientific organizations and special interest groups. Most English-speaking countries have supported the action to help curb global warming. The predicted effects of global warming are too much to go through what the governments of many countries have joined forces to help stop global warming. The war against global warming is an endless battle. The possible results are alarming for what people should help as much as possible.

The most noticeable change due to global warming policy occurred on December 11, 1997 with the creation of the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the international Framework Convention on Climate Chance, which aims to help reduce greenhouse gases that cause climate change. The Kyoto Protocol, effective February 16, 2005. Since late 2007 hundreds seventy-five countries have ratified the protocol. However, only thirty-six developed countries are actually required to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases to the levels required for each country in the treaty. Three other countries expected to participate soon.

While the politics of global warming have made major improvements in the fight against global warming there is still much to do. Australia's Labor Party has ratified the Kyoto Protocol, however, only came into force in March 2008. The Liberal Party government of Canada has ratified the protocol. Labour Government of New Zealand, Helen Clark, ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. The UK Labour Party has ratified the Kyoto Protocol. In the U.S. the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton signed the Kyoto Protocol. Many Democrats support a series of bills that reduce emissions. However, the Democratic Congress has never voted or not the United States is bound by the treaty.

The politics of global warming have long debated whether or not global warming is really so dangerous. Many countries are struggling to crack down on global warming. Others have questioned the scientific consensus on global warming, or simply refuse action to mitigate global warming. In February 2007 survey found that ninety-five percent of the forty-one congressional Democrats agreed that the surface of the Earth is warming because of man-made problems, while only thirteen percent of thirty-one Republicans who were surveyed agreed. Skepticism about global warming includes many newspapers in the UK and a few in Canada.

The politics of global warming in the battle to determine what to do to stop carbon emissions. While the U.S. has never officially accepted the obligation to reduce emissions of one hundred ninety five cities in the United States have pledged to reduce carbon emissions to seven percentage below 1990 levels. That's more than fifty million Americans to commit to the cause. California, the sixth largest economy, made in 2005 to reduce emissions from 2000 levels by 2010. It is estimated that by the year 2020 if the California car standards were held throughout the country motorists should save up twenty-six billion dollars a year.

The politics of global warming are always arguing and trying to implement new methods of stopping global warming. The unpleasant after effects of global warming, almost always ends in death and destruction. While we as humans are causing global warming have to do everything possible to assist governments to stop or at least slow down global warming. We must act before it's too late. Many skeptics believe that global warming will one day lead to the end of the world. If that's true no one really knows. However, a surprising statement says that we must work hard to the policy side to prevent that from ever happening.

The politics of global warming

Global warming alarmists are willing to sacrifice the global economy to reduce CO2?

2011-11-15T22:30:00.000-08:00

But where are they now that the economy is moving back up and CO2 emissions have increased? Well, are backing their own emissions reduction targets, and yet, still pointing to foreign competitors who say they are extremely air pollution, now more than ever. China is a major culprit in CO2 emissions, and has seen a large increase and India also, though to a much lesser degree.

There was an interesting article recently written by Jeff McMahon in his "The ingenuity of Commons" blog on the Forbes blog network on May 30, 2011. The article was filed under the category of Technology, entitled: "An economic indicator is triggered to record levels: carbon emissions" - and declared that;

"If carbon emissions from energy use indicate that economic growth, the global economy is roaring again. In 2010, carbon dioxide, energy production erased a fall of 2009 and exceeded the previous record set in 2008 , 5 percent, according to an estimate published yesterday by the International Energy Agency. "

Can we trust the data given any international organization, especially if their leaders are usually based European? I would say no, after seeing the global warming alarmists use deceit and political tricks to boost its research agenda. What I mean by tricks of policy research to promote an agenda?

It's really simple, and many political think tanks do this all the time, the Commission of Inquiry with a particular conclusion, they are seeking. If the investigation is biased manner appropriate to their data, maintain it, if they are not forgotten, and often hire a research group that is "exactly" what you are looking for - practical right? Once sufficient information is available if the data has been manipulated, or graphics and paintings have been exhibited in such a way to prove his point, then used as a scientific and empirical evidence for their cause.

Now, what worries me about this is that there are some environmental groups, who have taken the issue of global warming as a religion, and perfectly willing to reduce the world economy in the hope of reducing CO2 emissions no matter what the economic damage is done, no matter how many people lose their jobs or the number of people in how many countries are starving because they can not buy food because they can not find a job. In fact I hope you will consider this and think.

Global warming alarmists are willing to sacrifice the global economy to reduce CO2?

Gain more energy radicals

2011-11-03T16:57:00.000-07:00

In recent years, radical Muslims here have gained more power and energy, largely due to the weakness of our state. Our current government with the support of several parties and many of them are clearly in favor of the radicals.

These radicals are not only intolerant of the beliefs of minority groups, but also against the somewhat secular ideology of the state and its constitution, very tolerant.

Indonesia is the country with the largest Muslim population in the world. A large number of Muslims in this country are tolerant. In fact, many are moderate.

However, they are not as vocal as the handful of radicals who now see perpetrating violence against peace loving people in Indonesia, causing physical and emotional harm and causing awe undue Indonesian law for the loss of their basic rights for personal health, welfare and safety.

Unfortunately, these radicals have been made by various political parties for their own political reasons. Now they have become monsters.

On June 1, my friends and colleagues at the National Integration Movement and Anand Ashram Foundation (affiliated with the UN through the DPI) joined the National Alliance for Freedom of Faith and Religion in the demonstration for peace and anti-violence campaign.

We went there with our musical instruments, singing, dancing and having our message in a dignified, humane and nonviolent.

When we enter the realm where the National Monument in Central Jakarta, who were brutally attacked by radicals. More than 80 of us were injured - many seriously. One of our young people now suffer from permanent brain damage.

The police arrived, although a little late after these criminals did their work of violence. None of them was arrested on the spot. A few days later, after much pressure from the public and the media, the radicals who were undoubtedly responsible for these brutal attacks that many injured people were arrested.

Now, with thousands of followers, these radicals very hold any type of event and the campaign to almost anything in support of their mentors and ask for his release detainees.

The rise of radicalism in this country will certainly affect the safety of everyone. It is therefore in the interest of the world community that violent radicals must be stopped immediately. The evidence is abundant and is only the political will by our government is now required.

The phenomenon of Islamist radicalization and Jihad

2011-11-03T16:54:00.000-07:00

Imagine the headlines: "New Bin Laden Fatwa forbids attacks against the West" or "Bin Laden denounces terrorism." Too absurd? Could be. However, the number of processes we now call "de-radicalization" does not mean that.

Of radicalization is a relative change process in which a group of radical, violent behavior and reverses of abandoning ideology to legitimize-the use of violent methods to achieve political objectives, while also moving towards a gradual acceptance of social policy and economic changes within a pluralistic context. It even applies to armed Islamists? Yes, yes - in a fairly large scale.

Several armed movements, factions and individual activists have shown a remarkable transformation and ideological behavior towards non-violence. The processes of "de-radicalization" of these movements eliminated tens of thousands of former militants from the ranks of supporters of al Qaeda and acted as a disincentive for would-be militants. These processes have been carried out on a large scale (levels of the organization in Egypt, Algeria, Tajikistan, and a relatively small scale (levels of factions and individuals) in the United Kingdom, France, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Jordan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia - among others.

Too many questions arise: Why? Conditions? Impact? I can not answer them all here. However, previous research on the processes of radicalization, it is concluded that a combination of charismatic leadership, state repression, interactions with the "other" as well as within the organization, and selective incentives by the state and other actors are common causes of radicalization.

There is a pattern of interaction between these factors that ultimately the radicalization of many of the cases mentioned above, as well as non-Islamists of cases. State repression and interaction with the "other" often affect the ideas and behavior of the leadership of an armed and probably lead them to initiate three endogenous processes: strategic calculations, political learning and worldview (s ) review (s).

The first process is based on the calculations of rational choice and cost-benefit analysis. The second process is a product of socialization and interaction with the "other". Leadership beliefs are updated and re-evaluate their behavior due to the conduct of its interaction partner (s). The third process is largely based on perception and psychological factors. It is a process in which the leadership of an armed Islamist movement changed their view of the world as a result of serious crisis, frustration and dramatic changes in the environment.

Following these processes, leadership is a process of radicalization, which is reinforced by selective incentives by the state, as well as internal interactions (conferences, debates, meetings between the leaders, mid-level commanders, and bases in an effort to convince about the merits of radicalization).

In addition, de-radicalized groups often interact with violent Islamist groups and in some cases, the old influence of the last (domino effect). Such interaction is well demonstrated in the Islamic Group and Al-Jihad Organization in Egypt, the Islamic Salvation Army (AIS) and other small Islamist militias and factions of the GIA and the GSPC in Algeria and de-Islamist radical figures and individual suspects in Saudi Arabia.

So what should we do from here - both wise policy and research? Well, for starters, this is a little studied phenomenon not only in security studies, but also in sociological, political, Islamic, and the area.

Understanding the emergence and spread of political Islam

2011-11-03T16:43:00.000-07:00

In a post 9 / 11 society, political Islam is seen as a virulent force that threatens national security. In response, Western governments have taken extreme measures seek to paralyze political and militaristic national and international expansion of political ideology. Unfortunately, however, there has been little progress in this department. However, a small but growing minority of Muslims, the West and imperial interference in matters of the Islamic Middle East (ie, Israel-Palestine) is strongly condemned. Using this as a starting point, serious acts of terrorism have allegedly committed in the name of jihad.
The most emblematic representative of political Islam is undoubtedly the late founder of Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden. For nearly two decades, Islamist figure has stood for a militant form of Occidentalism, and has been named as the main orchestrator behind the attacks of 9 / 11. Based on these charges, many believe that the timely murder of this "bad man" by U.S. military forces was right and necessary. However, Bin Laden's death does little to improve the social and political conditions of radical Islam itself. With or without Osama bin Laden, the political-religious attitude will continue to be embraced by some Muslims who vindictively unfriendly to the West. Under these circumstances, the argument of old age than the symptoms, but avoiding the disease is fairly accurate.

According to Christopher Hitchens, the main push factor for political rise of Islam and the expansion is not Osama bin Laden, but the Islamic belief system. In the eighth chapter of the Quran, there is a passage that outlines broadly the right and the duty of every Muslim who fatally persecute those who fall under the rubric of "non-believers." This is a consequence of the biblical basis of jihadism. If this theory is correct - that certainly is not - why only a small minority of Muslims to embrace this political ideology? Well, in short, contemporary political Islam has little to do with theology. Normatively speaking, his followers are almost always within a very specific context of social, cultural and political. This finding is well explained by the Japanese-American political philosopher Francis Fukuyama, who argues that radical Islam is more accurately understood through the prism of modern identity politics. According to Fukuyama, globalization is blurring the distinctions clear time between the developed and the Middle East. Under such conditions, the Islamic faith is socially and geographically "deterritorialized", ie, through immigration and Western influences. As a result, the traditional Muslim identity becomes almost unbearable. This is particularly the case when the younger generation of Western Muslims are concerned. Without the daily social and cultural divisions that are in traditional Islamic societies, young Muslims living in Western Europe and North America often feel separated from their traditional ancestral ties. At the same time, Muslims also feel ontologically separate from the norms and values that are common within the host nations. In these unfavorable conditions, this generation of Western Muslims are extremely vulnerable to a kind of existential angst, when the proverbial question: "Who am I? "Subjective becomes difficult to determine. Fukuyama explains that political Islam and jihadism arise in response to this search for identity, and provides a sense of belonging to Western Muslims anomic nomination by statements such as:

"You are a member of a global umma defined by adherence to a universal Islamic doctrine that has been stripped of all his holy local customs and traditions."

This interpretation explains the fraction sociological western world Islamist political movement. In this case, Europe and North America Muslims - who are socially, culturally and politically alienated from his country's secular, democratic host - easy to embrace a doctrine that gives their personality a significant reason. This story explains the reasons why so many radical Muslims were originally non-Muslim in their daily behavior. Often, this kind of "secular Muslims were initially petty criminals who later became radicalized in the criminal justice system. Records show that many also abuse alcohol or drugs before they were inspired by political Islam. What these results suggest is that feelings of alienation and anomie, Western Muslims, like any other social group, they crave a sense of purpose in their life worlds. Based on these circumstances, political Islam provides sufficient antidote to the crisis existential.

The main thesis, while Fukuyama is certainly valid in Western contexts, remains to note that political Islam was originally a Middle Eastern reaction to the vices of Western imperialism. By asserting that political Islam is based primarily on a sociological necessity guided by a coherent set of self-identity, Fukuyama acquits U.S. and its allies in the political and economic oppression that has not stopped inflicted on Islamic societies. The United States and its questionable economic and military support of the territories occupied by Israel is obviously the most relevant case in point. This charge - along with other injustices as the Iraq war - must be recognized if political Islam must be understood in a global context.

Noam Chomsky says that the Islamist reaction to the west of the hegemonic forces is certainly not a recent phenomenon. In 1958, President Eisenhower said - in an internal discussion complaints - that hatred toward the U.S. and its allies is growing exponentially in the Arab world. This attitude was assumed by the autocratic governments of the region, however, but by real people. After an investigation that was conducted meant to suggest why this is the case, the U.S. National Security Council said that this hatred is based on the assumption that the U.S. and its allies (notably the United Kingdom and Israel) supporting brutal authoritarian regimes in the Middle East, North Africa and Indonesia, mainly because they want to control its lucrative oil reserves. In response to this accusation, U.S. representatives brazenly claimed that this was entirely correct and justified: if Western prosperity is to be performed, then the creation of alliances with Middle Eastern dictatorships with large amounts of natural resources is essential. Because the absolute frequency of this type of political-economic measures in recent history, the West is often considered to be complicit in preventing the democratization of the Arab world. Under these circumstances, people living under those regimes brutally repressive, have every right to be antagonistic toward the West.

The growth in the recent history of political Islam must be understood in global political and sociological terms. In recognition of anomic Muslims in the West are certainly sensitive to this political narrative embracive, the need to correct the social conditions that make them feel alienated in the first place is very important. Besides, it also has to be a recognition of the West and its role in supporting repressive dictators for the time you can keep raw material extraction in the region. These factors - along with a more friendly foreign policy - should be taken into account by the state, if radical Islam is to stop play a role in human affairs.

Unfortunately, kill Osama bin Laden did nothing in the grand scheme of things. The song of the U.S. One of Times Square - the terrorists holding premature death - was certainly short-sighted and will be short lived. Political Islam will continue to be adopted, regardless of the strength of Al Qaeda in personnel during the time that Muslims are mistreated with no explanation from the West. History will repeat for as long as we learn from our mistakes.

The problem of office politics

2011-11-03T16:36:00.000-07:00

When we join a new company, we are all hoping for a fresh start and clean slate. The last thing we want is to get involved in political intrigue, regardless of how insignificant it may seem. Most of us just want to do our job and move throughout our lives. Even if this were so, it is rarely the case, we still have to deal with "political correctness", as defined by society, we must recognize certain protocols in our gestures, language and behavior. Thus, even before starting a new job, we must recognize that there will be some form of policy, like it or not. I remember visiting a manufacturing company in the Midwest, where a vice president told me proudly, "I like this place Tim, there are no politics here at all." And I strongly believe that too. In fact, had a more ferocious than he had ever seen before.

If you are a new employee or a visiting consultant, one of the first things you need to find out a company is its hierarchical order. An organization that makes a useful roadmap in this regard, but it really does not define the power structure in a company. For example, a weak manager can actually draw their strength from a powerful ally. However, it is important to identify the strongholds of the company, the main actors are, and that the allies and adversaries. Without that knowledge, it is inevitable that travel in a political dispute or become unwitting pawn in a power play. The best advice in the early going is to just keep your eyes and ears open, and closes the mouth.

Apart from the power players in an organization, the three most common types of political animals are found Suckup, Radical, and the saboteur. The Suckup (also known as "Brown Noser") essentially has no spine and is the perennial "Yes Man" for the boss. The boss says "Jump" and Suckup says, "How High?" However, the Suckup itself has a political agenda that is usually a progression through the assistance of the chief. Therefore, leans backward to please the boss, at the expense of losing the respect of his colleagues.

The radical represents "a bull in a china shop" or "loose cannon" and is best known for rebelling against the status quo, not quietly but with force, and is not afraid of stepping on toes along the way . In many ways it's like Sherman's march to the sea. Maybe your mission is correct, and maybe not. In any case, this type of person has a small chance to succeed as his detractors are working overtime to undermine it. When it comes to a person who has basically two options: either join him and hope for the best, or get the heck out of your way not to run more.

The Saboteur is perhaps the most viscous of the three and probably can be best characterized as "conniving weasel" or "traitor" who schemes to make the lives of others miserable. It is driven by petty jealousies and wants desperately to be seen as a power broker in the institution. Since it has no real life of your property, the saboteur have fun anyone undermine their barns more attention than him. While Suckup and can be treated politically radical, the saboteur is a pest to be exterminated.

Office politics is about loyalty and trust. At some point, be asked to choose a side and this to me is what makes the ugly office politics. I could understand this in government policy, but not in a company where everyone assumes that the same team. Politics is an inherent part of corporate culture, some companies complain, others thrive on it. I guess it's a question of whether a company took the concept of teamwork or individualism. I found it much less politics and business in the promotion of the first and last. Anyway, my advice to anyone joining a new company, whether a corporation or a nonprofit organization, it is actually quite simple: "En garde!"

Paramilitary Politics: A Colombian Reality

2011-11-03T16:28:00.000-07:00

Mario Uribe Escobar, cousin of the president of Colombia and Colombia Democratic party leader, politics, announced the removal of the two congressional candidates, Rocío Arias and Eleonora Pineda, of his party on February 2 for their support to outside organizations paramilitaries. His announcement comes at the tail of a purge of a limited number of political candidates who are known to support Colombia's paramilitary organizations.

The two candidates are in a long list of politicians who privately admit that the close contact with the commanders. Arias and Pineda are considered the most public faces of a major effort and deep pockets to increase political paramilitary control at the national level through the next congressional elections to be held on Sunday, March 12.

A much smaller, more organized and influential group of former paramilitaries has become warlords. As a group, they began to exercise power in the world of politics a year ago city and state level. Their efforts were first recorded in the 2002 parliamentary elections. In these elections, candidates backed paramilitaries won over 90 percent of the vote, in many cases because there was no opposition candidate on the ticket and were afraid voters to abstain.

Through these strong-arm tactics, paramilitary organizations have begun to increase the number of politicians who control the Congress of Colombia. On this occasion, which look set to further increase that power. If they succeed, they will work to prohibit extradition, the eradication of its worst fears, while solidifying their position of power through numerous departments of Colombia. It is a fact that severely hinders democracy and sets of Colombia and the region on the path to less stability in the foreseeable future.

Paramilitary Politics
The departments of Colombia, which extends from Panama to Venezuela along the northern coast of the country have long been in the hands of the commanders who act both publicly and behind the scenes to control political candidates municipal levels, governor, and national levels. His strong political influence in the hands of coastal states, like Cesar, Guajira, Atlantico, Magdalena and Cordoba, is more evident, according to German Espejo, an analyst at Bogota-based Security and Democracy Foundation.

Mirror agree that the bottom of the paramilitaries and support for congressional elections. "In addition to financial support, it is possible that the paramilitaries to use their influence to obstruct the campaigns of candidates who do not support," said Espejo ISN Security Watch.

Claudia Lopez, Colombian journalist and Development Program (UNDP), consultant, concludes a study published in December 2005, which had a close look at the intersection of paramilitary control departments in northern Colombia and rates of landslide victories of political candidates in these areas. Their findings revealed atypical voting behavior in parliamentary elections in 2002 in the areas that have experienced high levels of related paramilitary massacres, and therefore is under paramilitary control, had been unopposed political candidates who were elected with over 90 percent of the vote.

The Colombian newspaper El Tiempo reported that the department of paramilitary-dominated Magdalena, mayoral candidates ran unopposed in 14 of the 30 municipalities in the department. The tendency of candidates to run unopposed, winning with inflated percentages of the vote has been repeated in numerous departments of Colombia. The trend, known as "paramilitarization" has been documented in the Colombian press and noted on the floor of the Colombian Congress.

Alvaro Sierra published a column in El Tiempo September 25, 2004 in which he declared that Colombia was becoming aware of the fact that "a substantial part of the country, the daily lives of millions of people, politics, the economy, and local government budgets, and an unknown amount of power and influence at the level of central government institutions like Congress, is in the hands of paramilitaries. "

Colombian Senator Carlos Moreno de Caro, vice-president of the Senate's Peace Commission, highlighted in the press in Colombia in March 2005 when he defended the measure as one to give lenient treatment paramilitary disarmament negotiations in , saying "the thing is that half the country is theirs."

Adam Isacson, director of programs with the Center for International Policy in Washington, DC, said Senator Moreno de Caro's statement was an exaggeration, but not a savage.

"Declaration of Salvatore Mancuso that the paramilitaries control more than 30 percent of the Colombian Congress was probably inflated," said Isacson. "But after the next election may be closer to the truth," he told ISN Security Watch.

Ineffective pre-election purge
Relatively few candidates publicly admit to their alliances with paramilitaries, however, many of them privately admit these links. This has created a "do not ask, do not tell" situation that has made it difficult for President Uribe to act on complaints from the opposition. Many fingers point in the public evidence, but little sustained complaints.

Paramilitary control of politics is a reality that some can digest and others can not. In the runup to the elections of March 12, many opposition candidates publicly demanded that President Uribe to do something to purge the lists of political candidates, the elimination of people believe that, in close collaboration with paramilitary leaders.

A great purge of political candidates suspected of links with the paramilitaries was more likely in the minds of U.S. ambassadorWilliam Wood, when in December 2005 stated publicly. "Corrupt electoral practices may occur in the 2006 elections, especially the paramilitary" Uribe told him to stop "meddling" in Colombian affairs.

Weeks later, at a meeting in Cordoba on January 9, Uribe public found very heated discussion between two senatorial candidates in the department of paramilitary control. Each claimed the other had made political pacts with paramilitary leader Salvatore Mancuso. Days later, Uribe asked the Attorney General of Colombia to investigate the senators links to the paramilitaries.

That same week, Gina Parody, a congressman from Bogota, declined invitations to stand as a candidate for one of the two main pro-Uribe political party, Partido de la U and Radical Change. He explained that his decision not to run with any of the parties is based on the fact that both parties are candidates "with links to paramilitaries."

She named Merheg Dieb Maloof and Habib, both running for re-election as candidate of the U. Maloof is believed to be a partner Jorge 40, leader of the Northern Bloc, one of the largest and most powerful organizations paramilitaries. Merheg has been suspected of links with the paramilitaries since 2003. Both were elected to Congress in 2002 as members of the party Colombia Viva, a political organization believed to be close to the paramilitaries.

On January 18, the wave of accusations and investigations came to a head. Both U Party and Radical Change expelled a total of five candidates from their ranks. However, these candidates were quickly absorbed by smaller pro-Uribe political parties, to the disappointment of the opposition candidates who supported the purges. Even after the very public removal of Rocío Arias and Eleonora Pineda, both candidates were absorbed by smaller pro-Uribe political organizations.

Power on extradition
What U.S. has been an ambassador of wood - and many others in Colombia - is concerned not only before elections and para bleed more. The 2006 elections can be placed in Congress enough power for politicians paramilitaries illegal extradition.

A law prohibiting the extradition represents a de facto victory of paramilitary organizations in Colombia. The U.S. has made nine requests for extradition of paramilitary leaders. All are immune to extradition under the protection of the disarmament process, but no definite assurance that it will not be extradited.

The prohibition of extradition is the focus of all the paramilitary leaders play political power.

If the Colombian government ran out of the bargaining power of extradition, the question of ultimate justice of human rights atrocities, drug trafficking and other crimes remain in the exclusive jurisdiction of the Colombian justice system, no one knows that have much success with Colombian criminals in the past. This system can definitely handle again in the future and paramilitary leaders are willing to assume.

Paramilitary influence in the Congress of Colombia, ultimately goes beyond extradition. Put organized crime in Colombia on the brink of the ultimate tool to protect itself - control over the legislative process.

With control over the legislative process, legally protected paramilitary leaders contribute to massacres and escalation of conflict with the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). Its status as warlords consolidated.

Increased drug trafficking and weapons are secure. Exploitation of the rural poor in Colombia on behalf of the elite class making rich and powerful landowner grow.

This reality concentrates wealth in power in the hands of a few, exploitation of others. It would consolidate many more years of uncertainty, both for Colombia and the region. And it promises a future where security - Uribe number one goal - in Colombia becomes a mirage. Paramilitary "king makers" rule from regional posts that contribute to a de facto "Balkanization" of the country and a weakening of state sovereignty and democracy. If the paramilitaries come to control the legislative process in the Congress of Colombia, a country ruled by warlords is a reality that might happen, and there is little that the Colombian government, or any other government, can do to prevent .

Politics and Religion - Where the rubber meets the spiritual path dirty

2011-10-18T11:02:00.000-07:00

We are disgusted with the use of the word "politics" and "religion" in the same sentence. Everyone is all tied by political correctness or win votes or to defend their beliefs. I used to believe that politics and religion should remain in their separate corners - as different as night and day. But now I've been really involved in the political process, I can say this: there is no place where religion is very necessary in politics. And here's another thing: if all the politicians who constantly blabber about their faith, going to church, and the belief in the Bible (or whatever) actually acted in accordance with beliefs that certainly would not be in this pickle .

Politics has to be overflowing with religion; no proselytizing, preaching, mean, hard head, "my way or the highway" people with no sense trying to pawn the religion, but the real deal. Love, respect, decency, compassion, understanding and kindness: these are the characteristics of most spiritual practices. Unfortunately, it is often more "religious" people who have the least of these qualities. Why do not people just walk the walk, as my political heroes / spiritual: Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and the Dalai Lama. Are

The four titans of politics and religion.

Mother Teresa was a Catholic nun who devoted her life to serving those forgotten by society and government. She and her nuns worked on life in the slums of Calcutta, India, among the lepers and AIDS patients and devastating diseases. She needed $ 3.7 billion to do anything. Mother Teresa has just appeared, and got the job done. She was a political warrior, all 4'9 "and never asked for a vote or a contribution from the PAC. In 1982, at the height of the siege of Beirut, who rescued 37 children trapped in a front-line hospital by a temporary brokering a ceasefire between the Israeli army and Palestinian guerrillas. Can you imagine? Accompanied by Red Cross workers, traveled through the war zone in the devastated hospital to evacuate the young patients. When he announced his intention to save these children around the world went crazy. It is very dangerous! You can not go in there! A major military type he said gravely.

"Oh, Mother Teresa, can not be reached unless there is a cease-fire."

I guess he thought it was impossible. The story goes that my little hero nun looked at him, smiled and said:

"Well, then there will be a cease-fire."

And there it was. She was sure that the power of love and peace. Mother Teresa never judge anyone. Judge not lest ye be judged. Never wait for the policy to assist in its mission to serve the poor.

Mahatma Gandhi was a Hindu, a lawyer, devoted entirely to the will of God. Through his early resistance to tyranny through mass civil disobedience nonviolent freed India from British rule of imperialism. He lived a simple existence, Spartan and yet millions move towards freedom. From Hinduism teaches that all humanity is one undivided family (like Christianity and Buddhism), "pain in a limb is felt throughout the body."

Gandhi maintained at a level to speak only the truth. Do you think our leaders can take a page from that book?

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Baptist preacher who became the leader of the civil rights movement in America. In the footsteps of Gandhi, King advocated nonviolent resistance but relentless injustice and tyranny. The protests were organized and directed literally changed the face of America. Although he never ran for office, Dr. King was a political and spiritual leader of international fame. He won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work and spent his life energizing and inspiring people to greatness. King speeches and rhetoric were blatantly religious.

"The purpose of life is to do the will of God," he said, "No matter what happens."

Finally, the Dalai Lama is the spiritual and political leader of Tibet. As the 14th Dalai Lama in the Buddhist tradition, His Holiness is believed to be the manifestation of compassion. in 1959 with the brutal repression of the Tibetan national uprising in Lhasa by Chinese troops, His Holiness was forced to flee into exile. It has never stopped working to free Tibet from Chinese oppression, and its ultimate goal is to democratize Tibet, allowing freedom of expression, belief, movement and assembly. He is revered worldwide as an ambassador for true peace, and has also received the Nobel Peace Prize. His Holiness has not sought nor advocated violence against the Chinese government. He has written books on leadership in business, so that compassion in the workplace, the connection between science and religion, and a wide range of other issues. The Dalai Lama describes himself as a simple Buddhist monk.

A Catholic nun, a Hindu lawyer, a Baptist preacher, and a Buddhist monk. Not a politician, and yet each one has had a huge impact worldwide. Each one lives a life fully consistent with his / spiritual principles. To tell the truth, living simply, they believed in selfless service to his people and the world. None of them tried to use religion as a weapon, like so many "religious" people do in our political system. All four of these mammoths walked the walk, and through them the world is much better.

Religion and politics? I hope and pray and work that these two worlds meet and merge. This would mean the end of politics as usual. We should public servants rather than politicians. We would like to have leaders who tell the truth, no matter what, and not act selfishly. We would have people walking in the footsteps of Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. King and the Dalai Lama. What a wonderful world.

God's Politics and policy are very different men

2011-10-18T10:50:00.000-07:00

The politics of God, like human politics is his way of governing us and urging us to follow their laws.

The fundamental laws of God are the Ten Commandments.

And the First Commandment forbids his people from being slaves of earthly governments.

The reason for this is simple. God only refers to his people in the form of agreements and contracts of all covenants are binding on both parties. And the purpose of all contracts to provide benefits to each party. And the contracts can only be made between people who are free to provide benefits to the other party to the contract. Enslaved people are not free to contract.

God, like everyone else in politics, should make offers to attract people to live under its law and governance. He frees people in the first commandment and therefore can not force anyone into a pact with him. Like human politicians can not force anyone to vote for their government.

And God and humans competing politicians and the promise of extravagant benefits to become the governor of the people.

They agreed that Joseph had saved from starvation by the confiscation of their land for Pharaoh and allowing them the privilege of living as tenants pay taxes on land formerly owned ...

You have saved his life, he told Joseph.

We are very grateful to you that we can be slaves to Pharaoh.

(Genesis 47:25)

And the Israelites industrious seemed to thrive until the king became jealous and fearful of their influence and ruthlessly tried to push ...

The Egyptians, therefore, feared that the Israelites were reduced to slavery cruel.

(Exodus12-13)

This is where God is the political and human rights is part of politics.

Earthly governments offer privileges may be revoked at the whim and discretion of granting the privilege.

In a contract, both parties are duty shall not revocable privileges promised by each party to the other.

And in every covenant with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden to your local bank on the corner, there is a penalty clause for breach of promise.

You local banker let you keep your house or your car while you make your monthly payments to the bank as you agree to a contract.

But if you stop making those payments, the penalty clause is activated and the bank take your car or house and all the benefits they provide these things. The banker, by contract can not take your property away from a mere whim.

God offers lavish benefits, contract and must provide and allow its people to maintain, unless you default on its promise to be faithful to his law, and promised ...

We will do what the Lord has told us.

(Exodus 24:3)

It is only for breach of his word which cause God is faithful to his contract and take action to enforce the penalty clause.

Pledged allegiance to the privileges of human politics does not guarantee that human government will continue to grant these privileges.

Politicians offer benefits elections and extravagant sweep without knowing much about exactly how they will "create jobs" or put "a chicken in every pot."

And they're after assuming office with all its commitments and pressures previously unknown can not grant these privileges ... at least not to the extent promised.

And so the human political, often has to backtrack on his campaign promises, because they need the help of others to fulfill their promises. And the other politicians can not be committed to the promises made.

God as creator, knows exactly what I can promise and deliver and deliver, if the people do not default on his faithfulness to his promise to keep His commandments.

He does not need anyone's help or approval to provide the benefits of their own creation to his chosen people.

Therefore, when the politics of God try to govern his people with the benefits it creates and grants them, tell the truth and offers to back up to a contract agrees to deliver.

When politicians make promises human, no matter how sincerely they have little control over the creation of the benefits promised to grant.

And this is how the politics of God differ from the policy of the pharaohs, ancient and modern.

But is not it ironic that many people have full faith in human political benefits, "but promised to find freedom under the law of God and that its benefits are expensive and unreliable ...

Why get us out of Egypt?

Did not I say in Egypt, when we said

"Leave us alone. Let us serve the Egyptians'?

Much better for us than the slaves of the Egyptians

to die in the desert.

(Exodus 14:11-12)

You may want to learn more about how this issue affects your ministry and religious education in the web address below.

Thomas Drummond, Ph.D. trained in clinical development, and neuropsychology. He has worked with the problems of clergy and religious of the Catholic Church for over 20 years. Most of his problems stemmed from the unfulfilled promises of God's law. They tried to evade the law of God through the definition of ministry in ways that were offenses against the law.

How to win at office politics

2011-10-18T10:41:00.000-07:00

For many companies, the game of office politics is a fact of corporate life. Some groups seem to have cornered the market when it comes to feeding the rumors, backstabbing and manipulation. Do you have to assume the role of villain or mole in order to get ahead? Not always. With a little forethought, you can manage these antics office without losing their integrity or avoid altogether.
Politics in the office

When it comes to office politics you have two options: to participate or abstain. Depending on the dynamics of your office, either course of action could cost in the end. Start by taking a closer look at how your office and various groups of employees at the function.

A good place to start is to identify who is doing promotions. If co-workers with mediocre talent are rising through the ranks faster than others, may be partly because they've played the game of office politics as well. In this case, spend some time observing the interactions between the management team and managers and their direct reports. Find ways to align your strengths with what the administration seems to value. Approaching it this way helps you keep some integrity while finding ways to work within the system in his office.

If there is no clear relationship between office politics and what is really important to your job or career growth, do not participate just because of fit in. Engaging in order to be part of the group could ultimately become against you, especially if the game-playing that occurs predominantly at the level of peers and management seems to pay no mind.

Allies and enemies

If you are having difficulty understanding what they are playing politics and that the actors are, to see if you can identify a manager or other senior executive employee could serve as a mentor. Ideally, this person should sit on a higher level than they have been with the company long enough to know what's going on.

Choose someone who not only has a deep understanding of the inner workings of the company, but also has the experience to help you consolidate your career. In other words, do not approach a potential mentor asking them to teach what they know about the office. Instead, focus on building a real working relationship with them. If you've chosen wisely, your mentor likely to give you the scoop without having to ask.

The enemies are harder to detect. While some co-workers will undoubtedly face difficult, others may be more subtle. In fact, the enemy can not say anything at all, but the use of nonverbal cues such as eye rolling, deep sighs and fingers touching while talking. While these behaviors can be distracting, do not let that intimidate you. If you place in front of others, avoid the situation with a little light humor for the person in question.

Other rioters office can not interact with you at all, but repeating gossip or start rumors to curry favor. You can choose to ignore or can be direct and opposite the private person. Do not be aggressive or threatening, but in fact and allow the idea that in his mind, he has a good reason for his behavior. You could even become aware of behaviors that contribute to the problem themselves.

Stay out of the race

You can be on good terms with your co-workers, staying focused on their own work and staying out of politics in his office, but sometimes you'll find a coworker who will try to tempt you each in. These behaviors may be deliberate or unconscious, but there are some ways you can stay out of the fray and not damage the relationship:

* Make it a habit to be discreet and not repeat any secrets shared with you. Its aim is to gain and maintain the confidence of their colleagues, not betray it.
* Do not share information with others who do not want to share with everyone, unless you are sure you can trust the person absolutely.
* When conflicts arise, do not focus on the people involved, but direct your attention to the problem. If you are able to offer suggestions for a solution, do it, especially if the solution has the potential for win-win.
* Remember that office politics is almost always personal. They strive to maintain the personalities of their conversations as much as possible and stick to the facts.

Avoid gossip

One of the telltale signs of office politics is gossip. Again, you have two options: an excuse yourself from the conversation or change the subject. Note that in any way, it is likely that your coworkers will be taken by surprise. Once they understand that we are not willing to participate, there is a good chance you will not try to bring back.

Conflict Management

When co-workers argue, it is natural that the individuals involved to want to get the support of his part of the argument. Whenever possible, avoid taking sides in a conflict that is not involved. Acknowledge the feelings of his co-worker and let him or her to vent her frustrations, but if you want to rise above office politics, maintaining a neutral position. Keep this in mind when the conflict in question directly involves you. Note that when you're angry with, or just do not like someone, how easy it is in contradiction with his statements just because you can. One-raising co-worker may feel very good right now, but in the long run, strengthening the fight between you and gives you gossip in the office something to talk about.

As hard as it may be, to curb the desire to react defensively. Learn to listen to suggestions rather than focusing on the person doing the suggesting. You may find that there is some truth in what they are saying, even if delivery is insufficient. Similarly, defensive driving carefully co-workers. In general, the person more defensive, more may be feeling insecure (this applies to you).

Freedom of expression in the Speakers' Corner (and the best weapons against offensive speech)

2011-10-18T10:32:00.000-07:00

When we visited London for the first time two years ago, I did not miss Kensington Gardens and the adjacent Hyde Park. I wanted to see Kensington Gardens because James Barrie, author of Peter Pan, had frequented the gardens and ponds in your home, just north of the park. And I wanted to visit the Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park on a Sunday morning.

Throughout Christendom, there is no finer symbol of freedom of expression that the Speakers' Corner. Since the 1870s, the socialists, radical priests, Muslim extremists, and crackpots of all varieties have been coming to this patch of grass for the exercise of their lungs for the benefit of anyone who will listen.

And so, one Sunday morning May found us gawking rudely to half dozen speakers, all standing on their soap boxes telling small groups of Londoners and tourists what was wrong with the world and how to fix it. In our search of local color (or "color" as the British curiously have), we got our money's worth at Speakers' Corner.

A colleague, a tireless talker, stood on a flag of the Socialist Party, looking like a socialist should look, preaching to a dozen listeners that Britain had fallen abjectly far from true socialism. Subsequent investigations identified him as Danny Lambert, a perennial candidate for local public office.

Another man in suit colors seemed to be speaking on behalf of an Islamic group of some kind. Posed that the United States in Iraq only because Americans hate Islam and because the U.S. government is controlled by the Jews (and not "Jews", but "the Jews", if you catch the distinction).

Another speaker was easily identifiable as a professional on the left. It was enthusiastically slandering George W. Bush and the United States, while keeping up the regime of Hugo Chavez in Venezuela bully as a model for the world to follow. We knew his type, experts in the following marching orders and stick to talking points. In the seventies, when we made the time on a campus in upstate New York, the university, its leftist counterparts were giving exactly the same speeches, except that it was Castro instead of Chavez. In the sixties, it was Mao, in the eighties, it was Daniel Ortega and the Sandinistas.

But why should I try to describe the Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park, when you can not improve on PGDescripción Wodehouse in his story "Comrade Bingo", of Inimitable Jeeves The? The story begins, as Bertie Wooster is said,

in the park - at the end of Marble Arch - where all kinds of rare birds accumulate on Sunday afternoons and standing on soap boxes and make speeches.

At the edge of the mob away from me over a bunch of chappies hat missionary service begins outdoors, close at hand an atheist let her go with a good deal of vim, though not a bit impairment have a roof to his mouth, while in front of me was a small group of serious thinkers with a banner labeled "Heralds of the Red Dawn."

Not much has changed in the Speakers' Corner since Wodehouse published "Comrade Bingo" at The Strand in 1922.

But we still have with us the question of how to deal with highly offensive language. In Canada, as I said bitterly before, the government has installed speech police in a "human rights tribunals" with authority to punish those who offend the sensibilities of religious and ethnic groups.

Wodehouse's approach is better. In the history of Wodehouse, one of the Heralds of the Red Dawn begins to berate Bertie Wooster and his fellow aristocrat, Lord Bittlesham, with hilarious insults. But instead of complaining that there are no laws against such diatribes, Lord Bittlesham simply gives back:

"Come away, Mr. Wooster," he said. "I am the last man to oppose the right of free speech, but I refuse to listen to this vulgar abuse any longer."

Wodehouse was to politics as a eunuch is sex, but its policy on offensive hate groups and authority figures can not be improved. When not ignore (like his character Lord Bittlesham), which mocked them mercilessly. The closest Wodehouse never got to a political issue was the creation of Roderick Spode, an enemy of Bertie Wooster in several stories, most memorably in Wodehouse's masterpiece The Code of Wooster, written during World War II.

In the 1920s, Wodehouse surely ran into people like the Heralds of the Red Dawn "Comrade Bingo," infatuated with Russian socialism. In the 1930s, Wodehouse must have looked with suspicion, as many in England were attracted by Hitler's National Socialism. One person was mistaken as Oswald Mosley, leader of the British Union of Fascists, whom Roderick Spode is modeled Wodehouse. Spode is a flamboyant figure with a Hitler mustache who loves to hear his own voice, makes his servile followers wear black pants, and dreams of becoming a dictator.

No amount of laws against fascist ideology could have damaged the cause of fascism more effectively than the kind of mockery and ridicule that Wodehouse Roderick Spode exerted. The thought police should learn a lesson from Wodehouse.

"What curse these social distinctions. Should be abolished. I remember saying that Karl Marx, and thought it might be an idea for a book on it." - PG Wodehouse, in his novel Quick Service

Do You play positive politics?

2011-10-18T10:24:00.000-07:00

How many of you have heard positive political expression? This is the opposite negative politics and I think you can see a change in the political position and behavior as their transfer to the highest levels in almost any organization.

As you climb the corporate ladder, or any organizational ladder, you'll find that people who are higher in the upper rarely engaged in what I consider to be negative politicking. Negative politics is that the manifesto "backstabbing" occurs. That's where people drop hints about the shortcomings of people or errors. That's where people in the meetings of other places, without notice. People who have no experience in the dynamics of the organization have not yet learned the risk of gossip in the queue, or talking to someone. They mistakenly believe that by eliminating the race to the bottom, will rise. Oh, how true.

The people who get up have learned the ability to promote a positive manner. In other words, there are things wrong with most people. That's what people at lower levels of organizations do. Instead, work together and do positive things for other people who deserve it.

What I am talking about is the positive politics. You can recognize it when you see it. For example, a group of people who are working together, a valuable project is available. And suddenly, one of those people is given the project by another person who has ever worked. This project is not only visible reward for excellent previous work, may be the result of partnerships built with the group leader.

This is a reality in America of the organization, whether corporate or not. What we get in position to do so is to grant that kind of positive visibility with others, and ultimately be the beneficiary of it too.

We want to position to make available opportunities for positive people within our organizations. We do this regularly. We want to hand things instead of keeping it selfishly for ourselves. These things come back tenfold classes to people who do.

This strategy not only project-based, can be as simple as filling out a job well done to senior executives. Behaviors sincere, selfless and altruistic are noticed, and rewarded the most times.

Rarely forget the time they were uncomfortable and embarrassed cornered in an environment of the organization. Playing a long-term resistance to help that person. The opposite is true. I'm sure each of you can think of a time someone did something positive for yourself and your career and how grateful she was. And from that moment, if that person asks you to do anything, you will do for them. Well, this is how politics works good. And that's how we create our own fate in our organizational structures.

Therefore, the negative politicking, we do not betray people for the things we've done wrong. That actually makes the behavior of the "rat" look even worse than "the victim". That the behavior that occurs with people at the lower end of their organizations.

What we do is to do positive things for others. And this is how we can promote the objectives of the organization, and hopefully find it for ourselves. Because most of the good deeds are returned.

The role of media in politics

2011-10-18T10:17:00.000-07:00

What role do new media and powerful in politics? The effects of short and long term can not be denied. But the new media offer us sound political information, or just entertain us for profit and ratings?

The new media

Occasionally, the system of the media in the U.S. States experiments significant transformations that signal a new level in its evolution. A broad recognition of the role of new media on the political scene came during the 1992 presidential campaign. The candidates met to talk radio, television, news magazine programs and the Internet. While the media offers many options to offer their points of view, the debate as to place or not the information content or entertainment had begun.

Talk Radio

If there has been a form of communication that has become emblematic of the new media is radio. Radio used to be the "night shift" of the airways. Radio reinvented itself. Radio became an important forum for candidates in 1992. President George H. Bush met with conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh. In 1994, nine talk radio hosts ran for statewide office or local. Most were unsuccessful, but their positions on the radio gave them legitimacy as
candidates.

Other unsuccessful candidates like former New York Governor Mario Cuomo and New York Mayor Ed Koch moved to jobs locally or nationally speaking, host of the show. Radio was a political platform. The suit in U.S. Ratings were up. Profits were rising. Radio had become a force to be reckoned with.

TV

Cable TV opened the airways to the beginning of opportunities for the media. Time intervals were filled with talk shows and news programs that you can tune in around the clock. The television media rapidly improved its position in the political process. Politicians and the press could not stop taking them seriously. One of the criticisms imposed was that the television media trivialize serious problems of government by mixing politics with entertainment. All political issues at hand can now be analyzed and examined the clock on cable news. Campaigns had to take a second look on the role of media in politics. The media could be a support tool or a thorn in the side. Campaign strategy had to be changed. The power of television can not be denied.

Internet

Twenty five years ago the term "modern" does not even appear in the dictionary. The modems connect people to online computer services such as CompuServe, Prodigy, America Online or MSN, and hundreds of thousands of websites around the world and home pages. Increasingly, the Internet has become a tool of political communication. In the network can get political information, express political opinion and mobilize voters and political leaders. You can also make political donations. This years presidential race, candidates have raised literally millions of dollars online. The web has become an electronic town hall. In a short time, the web has become a major player in the new media.

Conclusion

The media has found its niche in today's politics. Rather, his talk shows, television or the Internet, have laid the foundation, build a platform from which the voice of his social agenda and to strengthen their political power. How much of that voice is the quality of content is still under debate. One thing is certain, if you want to succeed in politics, it will not hurt to have the media in his corner.

U.S. policy and the second coming of the Tea Party: Part 2 of a series Part 2

2011-10-18T10:05:00.000-07:00

"In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this: You must first enable the government to control the governed, and secondly, it forces it to control itself." - Alexander Hamilton

This piece, the second of a two-part series, are shown in the left part to the demise of the Federalist Party and the rise of Democratic-Republican Party. Next, explore the history of other American political parties until today.

The party system in America was born as the Federalists, for central government and industry, and the Anti-Federalists, in favor of states' rights and agriculture, fighting for power. As part of the agreement that ended with the ratification of the Constitution, the two parties agreed that an elected body to choose the President and Vice President, not the people themselves. This was the method of electing the President until 1824, when the system we have now launched. George Washington was elected unanimously by the electoral vote as the first president and John Adams was his vice president.

The disappearance of the Federalists "was launched in 1790. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson took opposite sides in the formation of a central bank and the beginning of a national debt. Jefferson became the leader of what became the Democratic-Republican Party denouncing the Federalists no better than the king himself. Washington and Adams were elected again, and hung the Federalists in power. However, the ingredients of the first true American heavyweight fight was taking place. At the corner of the champion, was John Adams for president representing the Federalists. In the challenger's corner, were Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party. Washington decided to retire as his government was harshly criticized by the policy. In the next election, Adams received 71 electoral votes to 68 for Jefferson. For both unanimous choices harmonious political existence! The result was that Adams and Jefferson became president he became Vice President.

In 1800, Republican and Democratic parties remained aligned with the Republican Party getting stronger. As a result, the federal government grew stronger, too. The government was growing in the field of energy as well. The "Sedition Act", which punishes "any written false, scandalous or malicious against the government of the United States, or either House of Congress or the President," was considered an act of despotism. Jefferson and the Republicans won in 1800 and Aaron Burr, the Democratic Party leader, became Vice President. The Federalist Party was gone. The Democratic Republic - Republican Party, for the moment was to reign supreme. The effort to strengthen the central government too much power at the expense of the states had come to nothing, and the Federalists, as a well-defined parts, gradually disappeared from existence.

With the Democratic-Republican Party firmly in power, many laws were repealed unpopular, and the federal government went about their business. Over the next 30 years, the Democratic-Republican Party gradually became two separate parties.

In 1834, as the Republican National Party faded into the background, the Whig Party was born with leaders like Daniel Webster, who favored the power of Congress over presidential power. The Whigs wanted to expand the national government (and country) to the west. In 1840, the first Whig president, William Henry Harrison, was elected. The last Whig president, Zachary Taylor, was elected in 1848. The Whigs were not there for long. Mediocre comedies on television has lasted longer than the Whigs. In 1854, the Republican Party reformed, strengthened by the support of the Whigs and ragged soldiers free and independent.

In 1860, the issue of rights and slavery dominated the political landscape. The country was divided North and South. The Democratic Party, literally split in two, like the nation a year later. Southern Democrats favored federal protection of slavery in western territories, the Northern Democrats were not. They wanted the Supreme Court to handle the problem. This led to the election of a Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, who firmly believed that the Union is held together by the federal government at all costs. His policies and opposing views to the nation's blood was divided, division, four-year civil war that lasted from 1861 to 1865. The years of Reconstruction that followed the southern highlands of losing most of his political power for decades to come.

By the 1890s, Democratic and Republican parties, mostly as we know today were firmly entrenched as the two main political parties that controlled American politics. The Republicans became known as the Conservative Party or the right, and Democrats became known as the Liberal Party or the left. The parties themselves are entrenched in their position, becoming more and more in his philosophy, increasingly concerned about the Republican or Democratic values and less concerned about the values of the American people they governed. The gap between the party's values and American values varied so widely that Teddy Roosevelt broke his own separate party in the elections of 1912.

Teddy Roosevelt was a negative factor very important American presidential election in 1912, four years after he refused to run for president for a period of 3 rd. He found the president's policy of his own party, William Howard Taft, being too conservative for his taste. After a break at the Republican convention, Teddy formed Bull Moose Party and had enough votes to allow Taft Republicans that the Democratic candidate Woodrow Wilson won the presidency.

Little in the system of two political parties has changed over the past 100 years since the election of 1912, with the exception of an occasional independent like Ross Perot, who appeared in the 1980 and 1990 to make some noise, until too little. CNBC financial analyst Rick Santelli hit a nerve in a broadcast after the 2008 financial crisis erupted. Annoyed with more successful rescues of people who bought houses they could not afford and those who finance those houses, Santelli said: "We are thinking about having a Chicago Tea Party in July! All you capitalists that want to appear in Lake Michigan I am organizing a party! "

The Tea Party movement was born. Despite Santelli is not affiliated with the Tea Party directly, he said some things that many Americans felt at the time. Many like Santelli vocal tired of big government and special interest politicians taking money from taxes and throw all the problems in the hope of fixing it. Santelli and traders on the floor in the program expressed that they were tired of a government that perpetuates itself for the sake of government rather than for the good of his people. The Founding Fathers were right, the danger of any political system, however well intentioned, is going to grow to a point where your only concern is to maintain political power at any cost.

The Obama administration came in preaching change and are not the problem. Even if they really believed they could meet changed when he took office two-party systems do not. Policy change that would allow a shift in the balance of power. That has not happened in this country since the Whigs threw a curve ball to the grid at the back of this country have a policy framework in 1840. However, the fact is that change can be a good thing. The Founding Fathers called for a change. A new voice or see item could help the country to a new perspective. It is obvious that the Tea Party has gained a lot of people involved in politics who have never participated before. People, plus more to engage with different perspectives and different voices would be better. That's what democracy is all about. Of self-government is also involved and therefore equally represented.

The Tea Party has grown in its ranks, as members of the protests began training a couple of weeks after the Santelli rant. Since then, the fledgling movement has grown rapidly in the United States, sponsoring hundreds of protests, boasting millions of members, and affect the 2010 elections that swung the balance of power, once more than one party, the Democratic Party, two parties. The Tea Party, however, is not yet an official party policy in the United States. The line between autonomy and be ruled by a fine line that makes the project of the founding fathers did to the Constitution so miraculous. However, even they knew it would take an effort, perseverance, vigilance and participation to make a true work Democratic Republic.

As Benjamin Franklin famously said right after the Constitution was ratified, "Well, doctor, what do we have? A republic or a monarchy? A republic, if you can keep. "With greater participation of the American people and more effort on the part of the governed, the United States will remain a republic for many years to come, but it is not politics or political parties that make America strong is the people who make the nation who believe in the freedom struggle and that what is right. Sometimes you only need a new voice to remind each and every one of them.

As to what Ben Franklin would think of the Republic today and if all Americans should be aware of and involved in politics in the nation to maintain, I think Ben might have said, "Let's have a cup of tea and talk about it. With a little good open honest conversation, there's a consensus to find that it can meet all of us! "On the other hand, then, it always was penny wise and pound with intelligence!

I hope that you please consider all this and think about it.

Political Yard Signs - How to get attention

2011-10-18T09:59:00.000-07:00

For many months I have read countless articles written by experienced sign makers, political consultants and graphic artists offer their opinion on what ingredients go to make the perfect, the vote getting political yard sign. The "seasoning" that go in the recipe includes some sources, a variety of colors, along with the size of the sign only right policy. Combine that with the strategic placement of each sign and "poof" the candidate is instantly recognized as a serious contender.

That is, until the candidate wakes up the next morning only to see his political backyard perfect sign surrounded by what appears to be dozens of new political signs off the side of his signature and, often hiding their signs. His few hours of fame as a serious contender flows unnoticed in the sea of political signs. In the South there is a plant called kudzu annoying that the legend says that you can watch them grow literally watch them grow before your eyes. Stop at any street corner and see the political signs grow and grow and grow right in front of your eyes.

One fact remains that no matter how many signs they have at least some sign notices, which has lost money. They say size matters so it is natural that the field is full of people to go with more signs. And indeed, it can be a good direction. But before you lay down your hard earned cash for larger signs to close your eyes and visualize your own standing proudly with his big sign your name in lights again. Then close your eyes and visualize what will be right next to the large sign in a matter of days. You guessed it. A sign larger and probably better than your brand new sign. And The Beat Goes On!

What is the penalty?

First, recognize that the source you choose, the color of the signal, the size of your sign and where you put your sign is not in the short term, be different ... repeat no different than the host of other candidates.

Secondly, unless there is a huge war chest and donors a mile long, you can not win the battle for the game to see who has the most signs. After all, you now have twice the number of signs crammed with a dozen others in every corner of the city. 2 = 2 = 100?

Third ... and this is the ticket. Great signs are striking. "Anyone who is a hunter, or even play hide and seek as a child, knows that it is easier to detect its" prey "if it is moving. "Scientific movement causes the eye to go to the source of motion. In short, if the sign is moved, the eyes of voters will be attracted by your sign, your name will be recognized and most important to remember that the votes are cast .

There are indications that the use of a sign hanging participation that allows the signal to dance and spin. Judging people in their political campaign and see the difference.

SignThatSpin.com has revolutionized the political sign business that offers a variety of eye-catching signs with exclusive SignsThatSpin.com game hanging signs. The signs are very affordable, easy to install and you will name out in the crowd. Even in a "sea of signs" sign noticed.

Receive the political campaign ads Spin political signs

Political signs placement strategies

2011-10-18T09:51:00.000-07:00

Often, volunteers are asked to place political signs in garden locations specified by a candidate, but does not provide advice on how best to place them to maximize their effectiveness. Using some important tips can increase the visibility of the signal and improve the chances for people to remember the name on the poster.
The angle of correct sign

The placement of signs at an angle of approximately 90 degrees from the nearby road will allow drivers to start reading the signs of the elections as soon as possible. Drivers often have only a few seconds of time to take a look at a sample and digest the message, so that the placement of election signs at an optimal angle increases the chances that you read.

Do not try to capture the attention of all traffic on the street. When the signs of the elections are placed at the corners, your place for an ideal situation for a sense of movement and not four. If volunteers are trying to attract the attention of everyone driving on the street, the signal will probably be difficult for everyone to read and the candidate will not be able to take advantage of an excellent location. Spend the extra money and the placement of election signs on every corner is an excellent strategy.

Placement height - Patio political signs

Experts recommend placing the signs of the choice of half a foot to a foot of soil. Attached to the sign posts or fences and placed at the top are not usually safe for a driver to read while traveling on the road.

Study area and determine the probability that the sign is stolen or damaged. Find out if there is a history of damage in particular neighborhoods sign of his constituency. You can still place election signs in the area, but do not place great signs of expensive material. Placing your company in the areas of public property will increase the chances of it not being removed.

Special purpose Voters

Sign is not enough place in heavy traffic areas. If you want to draw the attention of young voters place political signs near shopping centers and in their entries. Place at the nearby schools and areas of the city that is known about the nightlife.

Their position in office centers to increase name recognition for candidates with business people. Located close to schools will increase name recognition with adults who take their children to school. Boards of the most popular films and other grocery stores are great locations. The malls are good places when targeting women voters.

Highway distance

Consult local authorities about the proximity of political yard signs can be on the road. Most cities require signs of having more than 10 feet from the road. Also, if placed in the royal gardens in either public or private property keep in mind that the grass was cut once in a while and signs may be damaged or removed from the earth.

Selection of high-traffic locations and appropriate places for target groups and correctly position the election signs can significantly increase the number of people will notice the signs and increase the readability of the same. It is important that staff and volunteers be trained to effectively implement political yard signs in order to increase the recognition of a candidate's name.

Agglutination

Often, the signals are placed in groups of three or four properties in a row can give the impression that there are more supporters. This concept of grouping signs together can also make fewer signs seem more than what actually exists. If you receive a yard sign application for a residence sure to ask the residence of both sides for their assistance in the placement of campaign sign.

Dandelion Signs

Each spring, seemingly overnight, the green landscape changes a sea of yellow spots as the dandelion flower. The reason for this change in nature is so remarkable, is because it occurs quite abruptly. The same technique can be applied to how to put his signature courtyard. Candidates who gradually release their signs are missing a huge part of the impact of a political sign or business can have.

The best way to capture the attention of people with their signs is to allocate 90% of all towns in the sale sign, before signing up to go. Then in one night to get all the volunteers that you can gather together and make the most signs up all at once. The next morning, his constituents drive to work to realize the enormous change in the landscape. Suddenly they want to know, what this new candidate for all, and why so many people rally behind them. First impressions are everything, and this can be an effective "wake-up call" not only to voters, but their opponents, and opponents tend to make decisions shaken irrational.

Synchronization

Probably the most frequently ask the question that we hear is: "How far should I put my signature on the earth." While consulting the community has debated this issue for years to conclude that most want your signature is released when people have their minds on the election. For most elections in this way signs should go up about 30-40 days before early voting. (For elections that do not have early voting 30-40 days of the current choice) If the signals are put out long before these people start to get used to them and they forget what they're even on. Signs posted 20 days long after the effectiveness loose to become household names.

Welcome to Kreitlow Corner

2011-10-11T04:03:00.001-07:00